Peer Review Process
Peer Review Process
The Journal of Innovative Multidisciplinary Studies (JIMS) employs a rigorous, professional, and fair peer-review system to ensure that published research is of high quality, originality, and academic value. Each manuscript submitted is given a careful examination by qualified reviewers who have a background in the field and academic knowledge of the subject. The review process aims to guarantee that published articles are scholarly and ethical.
Purpose of Peer Review
Peer review is an integral part of high-quality and credible academic work and in the credibility of research.
The review process helps to:
- Appraise the originality of research
- Evaluate the academic value and suitability
- Enhance clarity and presentation
- Maintain the reliability and validity of research
- Respect ethical publishing practices
JIMS appreciates positive academic comments which will enhance the quality of research.
Initial Editorial Review
Manuscripts are first screened by the editorial staff after submission.
At this point, the editorial staff reviews:
- The scope and relevance of the journal.
- Structure and presentation of manuscripts.
- A sense of originality and ethical values
- Basic academic quality
- Compliance with the submission guidelines.
Manuscripts submitted that conform to the requirements of the journal are sent for double-blinded review.
Reviewer Evaluation
Manuscripts submitted are considered by independent reviewers who have expertise in the field to which the manuscript is submitted.
A manuscript should be reviewed by a reviewer according to the following:
- Research originality
- Academic contribution
- Methodology and analysis
- Clarity and organization
- Relevance and significance
- Ethical research practices
The manuscript can be accepted, revised or rejected based on the recommendations of reviewers.
Revision Process
Authors will be asked to revise manuscripts in the light of comments made by reviewers and editors.
Revisions help improve:
- Research clarity
- Structure and presentation
- Data interpretation
- Academic quality
- Overall readability
It is the policy of the author to carefully and professionally respond to suggestions given in the reviews.
Confidentiality and Fairness
JIMS maintains confidentiality throughout the process of the review and publication of the articles.
Manuscripts, reviewer comments, and editorial decisions are dealt with in a responsible manner and are only shared with authorised persons associated with the reviewing process.
The journal will adhere to fair, unbiased, and objective evaluation without discriminating and without giving preference to articles based on the nationality, gender, institutional affiliation, or personal background.
Editorial Decision
The editorial team takes into account the recommendations of reviewers and the general quality of the manuscript to make a final decision on publication.
The following is a list of possible editorial decisions:
- Acceptance
- Minor revision
- Major revision
- Rejection
The Journal will strive to keep communication clear and keep the process moving.
Commitment to Quality Publishing
The Journal of Innovative Multidisciplinary Studies (JIMS) continues to uphold an open, ethical, and academically responsible peer review process.
The journal remains committed to publishing high-quality research work carried out from multiple disciplines through the professional evaluation and constructive scholarly review process.
